# Can someone please outline the equivalence of mass and energy proposed by Einstein?

In physics, mass–energy equivalence is the concept that the mass of a body is a measure of its energy content. In this concept, mass is a property of all energy, and energy is a property of all mass, and the two properties are connected by a constant. This means (for example) that the total internal energy E of a body at rest is equal to the product of its rest mass m and a suitable conversion factor to transform from units of mass to units of energy. Albert Einstein proposed mass–energy equivalence in 1905 in one of his Annus Mirabilis papers entitled "Does the inertia of a body depend upon its energy- content?"[1] The equivalence is described by the famous equation: where E is energy, m is mass, and c is the speed of light in a vacuum. The formula is dimensionally consistent and does not depend on any specific system of measurement units. The equation E = mc2 indicates that energy always exhibits relativistic mass in whatever form the energy takes.[2] Mass–energy equivalence does not imply that mass may be "converted" to energy, but it allows for matter to be converted to energy. Through all such conversions, mass remains conserved, since it is a property of matter and any type of energy. In physics, mass must be differentiated from matter. Matter, when seen as certain types of particles, can be created and destroyed (as in particle annihilation or creation), but the system of precursors and products of such reactions, as a whole, retain both the original mass and energy, with each of these system properties remaining unchanged (conserved) throughout the process. Simplified, this means that the total amount of energy (E) before the experiment is equal to the amount of energy after the experiment. Letting the m in E = mc2 stand for a quantity of "matter" (rather than mass) may lead to incorrect results, depending on which of several varying definitions of "matter" are chosen. When energy is removed from a system (for example in binding energy, or the energy given off by an atomic bomb) then mass is always removed along with the energy. This energy retains the missing mass, which will in turn be added to any other system which absorbs it. In this situation E = mc2 can be used to calculate how much mass goes along with the removed energy. It also tells how much mass will be added to any system which later absorbs this energy. E = mc2 has sometimes been used as an explanation for the origin of energy in nuclear processes, but mass–energy equivalence does not explain the origin of such energies. Instead, this relationship merely indicates that the large amounts of energy released in such reactions may exhibit enough mass that the mass-loss may be measured, when the released energy (and its mass) have been removed from the system. For example, the loss of mass to atoms and neutrons as a result of the capture of a neutron, and loss of a gamma ray, has been used to test mass-energy equivalence to high precision, as the energy of the gamma ray may be compared with the mass defect after capture. In 2005, these were found to agree to 0.0004%, the most precise test of the equivalence of mass and energy to date. This test was performed in the World Year of Physics 2005, a centennial celebration of Einstein's achievements in 1905. [3] Einstein was not the first to propose a mass–energy relationship (see the History section). However, Einstein was the first scientist to propose the E = mc2 formula and the first to interpret mass–energy equivalence as a fundamental principle that follows from the relativistic symmetries of space and time.

The answer sheik provided might be correct, but it's probably not his answer. It was most likely copy and pasted from some source that he did not cite. Which is a violation of copyright laws of most countries.

Here's my answer, not copied from anyone.

In math talk the mass-energy equivalence is written as e = mc^2, where m is rest mass, c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and e is the equivalent energy. What it means is that mass is stored energy that can be released and used as working energy. And it works in reverse, working energy can be stored as mass. They make mass in labs, but very very little as it takes a whole lot of energy to make just a smidgen of mass.

If all the mass in 1 kg were converted into working energy there would be enough energy to power the City of New York for two years. And conversely, it would take that much energy and more, due to losses, to make 1 kg of mass. You can see how much energy is needed by solving e = mc^2 = 1*(299.79E6)^2 = ? plus more to cover losses.

The mass energy equivalence is the stored or potential energy. There is also kinetic energy, k = Mvc, where M = m/sqrt(1 - (v/c)^2) for that rest mass m. M is the relativistic inertia when the rest mass is going v speed. Together, e and k make up the total energy of a mass, m. And that total energy E = Mc^2 = sqrt(e^2 + k^2).

### Trending

- Magnetic field help?
- What are some interesting time traveling theories that you've heard of?
- How many 1.19 µF capacitors must be connected in parallel to store a charge of 0.757 C with a potential of 151 V across the capacitors?
- In single slit diffraction, for a slit of width d, why do you assume that the two point sources that interfere are?
- What was Jesus's views on Quantum Physics?
- Is Stephen Hawking righ or wrong? we are just a breed of monkeys on the 3rd planet of the sun ?
- Who is the new Albert Einstein on earth after Stephen Hawking died?
- An object moves with a constant speed of 23.6 m/s on a circular track of radius 195 m. What is the acceleration of the object?
- Since time moves differently for satellites than it does on the ground, then how do we know its our satellites we're communicating with?
- Is the speed of thought faster than the speed of light?