Jeez I didn't expect Suleiman Benn to be that good!!!!!!!!, Aussies what do ya think!!!?

Good. Great numbers, makes for a great game.

Soooo - Suleiman, su le su le, suleiman.

(Hot August Night).

2 days left.


Bewdiful.

I have a feeling he may become the cult hero of the summer like Monty Panesar did the last time England toured here.

hes pretty good...i just hope he can help win it for the Windies...i hate Australia

Suleiman Benn is a capable spinner and has shown his ability with India recently.

It clearly proves my statement that Aussie are vulnerable to quality spin and they have lived upto it.

Even during the Ashes Australians struggled against the mediocre spin of Panesar and had no clue on Swann. Panesar had a dread R/R of 2+ when Punter scored 159 runs and he was struggling against Panesar.

He bowled well and fully deserved his five wicket haul.

However, the Australian batting lacked discipline. Three of the top six batsmen scored over 70 but no one went on to a big score. Two others got over 30 and got out. That they got so close was due to Haddin and Hauritz having a lash.

Suleiman is proving to be a very good bowler, & just what WI needs to get them back among the winners. Great spell of bowling!

Benn has a severe Anger undertaking which needs interest by ability of going to a pair anger administration instructions. purely because of the fact he's significant and he has a surname of Benn does no longer mean he's of an identical significance as massive Ben in London. he's an exceedingly conventional bowler with an exceedingly undesirable suggestions-set. If he acted an identical on the streets as he did today on the cricket pitch somebody could have given him a robust touch up and with any luck sooner or later will supply him the actuality verify he needs. He has been observing too lots of Harbhajan Singh thinking he can break out with actual and extremely gruesome habit on the sector and thinks being massive headed on the sector is high quality once you're a exceedingly conventional bowler. he will come to his senses sooner or later and understand he's not the bowler Shane Warne was, neither is he the oftentimes used of chucker that Murali is so isn't in a position to bamboozle batsman with stunning bowling in Warnes case or stunning chucking in Murali's case. as quickly as he does understand this then he will develop into greater comfortable on the sector and stay as much as what he provides along with his bowling.

Suleiman Benn is a decent Orthodox spinner who is usually economical, but he still needs to develop his technique. It took him 53 overs to seize 5 wickets, and 4 of those were supremely unimpressive. Simon Katich was the only batsman he sent back to the pavilion due to good bowling. Let me explain:

Shane Watson was extremely nervous about the possibility of scoring his first test century and felt intimidated by Benn (there was a confrontation between the two earlier in the Test). He was dismissed after just the second ball of the day, no surprise there. Next was Marcus North who was caught by Dwayne Bravo in the slip cordon - the result of pure luck. North tried to sweep Benn and initially missed the ball, but when the bat swung back, it touched the ball and guided it straight into the fielder's hands. Michael Clarke's walk was not the consequence of ingenuity from Benn either...The delivery Benn produced was quite poor - very wide from off-stump, and Clarke played a lazy shot - his own fault and no one elses. Lastly, Peter Siddle is a rather ordinary batsman, and any tail-ender wicket should not be taken seriously.

In my opinion, one 5 wicket haul is not enough to deem someone lethal, and given the nature of the wickets I do not believe Suleiman Benn deserved it. Therefore, I must respectfully disagree with you.

Good day!